ÿþ<HTML><HEAD><TITLE>XII CONGRESSO INTERNACIONAL ABRALIC</TITLE><link rel=STYLESHEET type=text/css href=css.css></HEAD><BODY aLink=#ff0000 bgColor=#FFFFFF leftMargin=0 link=#000000 text=#000000 topMargin=0 vLink=#000000 marginheight=0 marginwidth=0><table align=center width=700 cellpadding=0 cellspacing=0><tr><td align=left bgcolor=#cccccc valign=top width=550><font face=arial size=2><strong><font face=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif size=3><font size=1>XII CONGRESSO INTERNACIONAL ABRALIC</font></font></strong><font face=Verdana size=1><b><br></b></font><font face=Verdana, Arial,Helvetica, sans-serif size=1><strong> </strong></font></font></td><td align=right bgcolor=#cccccc valign=top width=150><font face=arial size=2><strong><font face=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif size=1><font  size=1>Resumo:653-1</font></em></font></strong></font></td></tr><tr><td colspan=2><br><br><table align=center width=700><tr><td><b>Oral (Tema Livre)</b><br><table width="100%"><tr><td width="60">653-1</td><td><b>Idiots of all countries Unite
Can knowledge be more than recognition? Is perception different from identification? Is life more than repetition? The  idiot  appears as a figure irreducible to the identity of the general and the particular.</b></td></tr><tr><td valign=top>Autores:</td><td><u>Teschke Henning </u>  (AUGS - University of Augsburg) </td></tr></table><p align=justify><b><font size=2>Resumo</font></b><p align=justify class=tres><font size=2>Idiots of all countries Unite

Can knowledge be more than recognition?  Is perception different from identification? Is life more than repetition? The  idiot  appears as a figure irreducible to the identity of the general and the particular. The idiot demands everyone to set himself free from the ruling prejudgements and clichés in order to encounter himself beyond representation. Conceptual and esthetical figure at once, the idiot constitutes a singular determination and a specific power incompatible with each social order. He wants to start with a manner of thinking that shares the nature of each individual: to be unique and irreplacable, in other words: to be an idiot. In philosophy, theology and literature, his long history begins with Socrates, continues through Nikolaus Cusanus and hasn t come to an end with Dostojewski. The 20th century multiplies the idiotical interventions.   
</font></p></td></tr></table></tr></td></table></body></html>